A methodological framework for participatory AI

AI from the Margins

An inclusive approach that centers the lived experiences of minoritized communities to design more equitable AI applications in healthcare and beyond.

Explore the method Get in touch

Why it matters

AIM session — group of participants around a table

AI is increasingly embedded in healthcare — shaping clinical decision-making, disease detection, and support for daily living. Despite its promise, AI applications can reproduce or amplify existing inequities, creating particular vulnerabilities for minoritized communities.

Participatory AI promises to democratize AI design by involving affected communities. However, much of what is labeled participatory remains instrumental rather than transformative — using participation to optimize systems rather than to genuinely share power, ownership, or agency.

AIM addresses this gap by introducing a pre-design stage in which lived experiences are explored without technological framing, ensuring that the voices of those most affected shape AI from the very beginning.

The AIM method

AIM operationalizes lived experience as a prerequisite for participatory AI design. Rather than treating lived experience as an input within existing processes, AIM structures pre-design engagement through dedicated lived experience sessions.

Free narrative (SQUINN)

Each participant tells their own story in their own words, without predefined questions or frameworks. This session creates space for everyone to share what they consider most significant.

* May be repeated across multiple meetings to ensure every voice is heard fully.

From individual lived experiences to shared rules

Individual narratives are brought together to identify patterns, tensions, and shared themes — moving from personal stories toward collective insights.

Translation to participatory AI

Shared insights are translated into concrete requirements and principles for AI design, keeping community voices central to the process.

Policy embedding

Outcomes are embedded in organizational and policy contexts, ensuring insights are reflected in governance and decision-making structures.

Based on the work of

  • Add author / work here — e.g. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice.
  • Add author / work here — e.g. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing.
  • Add author / work here

Publications

2026

AIM paper publication

Full paper presenting the AIM framework and findings from eight lived experience sessions with 13 participants.

TBA

Add publication here

Add a description, journal, or conference name here.

Get in touch

Interested in the AIM method, a collaboration, or a presentation? Fill in the form below and we will get back to you.

133